Under the Guise of Aid: The Far-Right French NGO Allegedly Supporting War Crimes in Syria
Logo

Under the Guise of Aid: The Far-Right French NGO Allegedly Supporting War Crimes in Syria

Under the Guise of Aid: The Far-Right French NGO Allegedly Supporting War Crimes in Syria

For years, it has been an open secret that a French charity co-founded by far-right sympathizers has been in bed with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime. The organization, SOS Chrétiens d’Orient (SOSCO, or SOS), was also an official “partner” of the French Defense Ministry at a time when the charity allegedly provided moral and material support to pro-Assad militias accused of committing war crimes. An investigation conducted by the New Lines Institute for Strategy and Policy and New Lines Magazine reveals new details about SOSCO’s alleged relationship with pro-Assad militias, including potentially damning testimony from witnesses that the nongovernmental organization might have directly funded one of the militias.

This alleged support would have occurred during and after the militia is said to have committed rights abuses that targeted the very community SOSCO claimed to be helping. According to France-based rights lawyer Laurence Greig, who worked pro bono to examine evidence gathered in the NewLines investigation, SOSCO’s alleged support of pro-Assad militias appears to have violated French laws and regulations regarding anti-terrorism, anti-corruption, and complicity in war crimes. Greig adds that prosecuting SOSCO in French courts would also open one militia and its leader to prosecution in France, even if in absentia, as an extension of a SOSCO court case.

Assad, Far Right Extremism, Middle East, Militarization, Nonstate Actors, Syria

Related Articles

Protecting the U.S. Government from Far-Right Insider Threats

Protecting the U.S. Government from Far-Right Insider Threats

Ample evidence shows that people adhering to far-right extremist ideologies have worked for the U.S. government and obtained security clearances and have abused their access to information and resources. In this report. Alejandro Beutel and Daryl Johnson examine this evidence and make recommendations for the U.S. government to prevent infiltration by extremists who could endanger the country.

Policy Report
Gender and Genocide in the 21st Century: How Understanding Gender can Improve Genocide Prevention and Response

Gender and Genocide in the 21st Century: How Understanding Gender can Improve Genocide Prevention and Response

A two-day conference the New Lines Institute held in September addressed the role that gender plays in genocide and how taking a gendered perspective can bolster prevention and improve government responses. This report addresses the issues covered during the conference and ways to make sure that gender is considered in efforts to prevent and respond to genocide and in efforts to hold perpetrators accountable. 

Policy Report
Climate Change and Mobility: An Agenda for the United States

Climate Change and Mobility: An Agenda for the United States

After a discussion of the forms of human mobility that could be affected by climate change, this analysis examines the four areas to be addressed in the administration’s report.

Policy Report
The Case for Making Myanmar’s Report Public

The Case for Making Myanmar’s Report Public

Myanmar is required to report periodically on the measures it has taken to comply with the Order. The purpose of the provisional measures reporting requirement is to permit the Court to assess the appropriateness and adequacy of measures taken and to consider whether additional measures may be merited. Myanmar’s two reports filed to date have been classified confidential, available only to the Court and The Gambia. Myanmar’s third report is due in the coming days.

Policy Report