The Case for Making Myanmar’s Report Public
Logo

The Case for Making Myanmar’s Report Public

The Case for Making Myanmar’s Report Public

On November 11, 2019, The Gambia filed an application at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) instituting proceedings against the Republic of the Union of Myanmar for violations of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in respect of the Rohingya group. The case was brought pursuant to the Convention’s obligations that are considered erga omnes (owed to the international community as a whole) and erga
omnes partes (owed by all member States to the Convention). In other words, a public interest case.

On January 23, 2020, the ICJ issued an order requiring Myanmar to take measures to prevent the risk or possible recurrence of genocide against the Rohingya minority and to preserve evidence of the 2017 attacks. Myanmar is required to report periodically on the measures it has taken to comply with the Order. The purpose of the provisional measures reporting requirement is to permit the Court to assess the appropriateness and adequacy of measures taken and to consider whether additional measures may be merited. Myanmar’s two reports filed to date have been classified confidential, available only to the Court and The Gambia. Myanmar’s third report is due in the coming days.

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not an official policy or position of Newlines Institute. 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

International Court of Justice, Myanmar, Rohingya

Related Articles

Protecting the U.S. Government from Far-Right Insider Threats

Protecting the U.S. Government from Far-Right Insider Threats

Ample evidence shows that people adhering to far-right extremist ideologies have worked for the U.S. government and obtained security clearances and have abused their access to information and resources. In this report. Alejandro Beutel and Daryl Johnson examine this evidence and make recommendations for the U.S. government to prevent infiltration by extremists who could endanger the country.

Policy Report
Gender and Genocide in the 21st Century: How Understanding Gender can Improve Genocide Prevention and Response

Gender and Genocide in the 21st Century: How Understanding Gender can Improve Genocide Prevention and Response

A two-day conference the New Lines Institute held in September addressed the role that gender plays in genocide and how taking a gendered perspective can bolster prevention and improve government responses. This report addresses the issues covered during the conference and ways to make sure that gender is considered in efforts to prevent and respond to genocide and in efforts to hold perpetrators accountable. 

Policy Report
Under the Guise of Aid: The Far-Right French NGO Allegedly Supporting War Crimes in Syria

Under the Guise of Aid: The Far-Right French NGO Allegedly Supporting War Crimes in Syria

An investigation conducted by the New Lines Institute for Strategy and Policy and New Lines Magazine reveals new details about SOSCO’s alleged relationship with pro-Assad militias, including potentially damning testimony from witnesses that the nongovernmental organization might have directly funded one of the militias.

Policy Report
Climate Change and Mobility: An Agenda for the United States

Climate Change and Mobility: An Agenda for the United States

After a discussion of the forms of human mobility that could be affected by climate change, this analysis examines the four areas to be addressed in the administration’s report.

Policy Report