Skip to content

New Directions in U.S. Policy for Central Asia

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan
ISTANBUL

Executive Summary

In late 2019, the Trump administration did something no other U.S. administration had done: it issued a new Central Asian strategy. This strategy commendably envisions Central Asia and Afghanistan as a single region and does not subordinate policy in Central Asia to the requirements of the war in Afghanistan. Nevertheless, this strategy faces serious challenges.

First, unless Afghanistan’ government can coalesce, the agreement with the Taliban will not hold and the possibilities for spreading violence will grow. Second, China and Russia will certainly oppose any strategy and policies designed to enhance the U.S. presence in what they both consider to be their imperial peripheries. Third, the scope and magnitude – if not the duration– of the coronavirus pandemic will lead many domestic sectors to oppose the use of U.S. resources for a Central Asian strategy, which those sectors consider superfluous. Since Central Asia’s needs due to this crisis will be enormous, it is imperative for Washington to work as much as possible with its allies: the European Union, South Korea, India, and Japan, all of whom have substantial Central Asian portfolios to maximize trade and investment opportunities. And apart from fostering trade and investment opportunities for the United States in Central Asia and vice versa, the United States can provide valuable help in improving governance along key trade routes and borders to enhance Central Asian connections to the entire world and reduce the strangling costs created by corruption or inefficiency.

At the same time, Washington must – despite the demands on its resources – redouble its efforts to communicate to both elites and the public at large in Central Asia and demonstrate the benevolence and effectiveness of these policies. And it must do the same thing at home to build enduring support for the strategy. Other desirable forms of support include security cooperation between the U.S. and Central Asian militaries or cooperation with thriving defense industries in the region. Since the U.S. administration clearly casts China as its main adversary, this coordination with local governments, allies, and partners must aim to give Central Asian states alternatives to Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative and expand local governments’ capacity to deal with Moscow and Beijing even while opening up to the rest of the world.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and not an official policy or position of the Newlines Institute.

Related Articles

‘Targeted and Precise’: Innovation versus Regulation in the Critical Technology Sector  

‘Targeted and Precise’: Innovation versus Regulation in the Critical Technology Sector  

The People’s Republic of China’s illicit transfer and weaponization of foreign critical technologies pose a dire threat to U.S. national security and global leadership. While the dominant policy discourse promotes a whole-of-government approach to mitigating these risks, less attention has been given to the potential negative effects of the shift to stronger industrial policies on the American research and development ecosystem. Even when written for strategic competitiveness, too-broad regulations stifle innovation by imposing barriers to entry for new competitors, with disproportionate negative impacts falling on parties with less access to capital and who abide strictly by the law.  

Iraqi Military Forces’ Capacity in the Wake of a Likely U.S. Withdrawal from Iraq 

Iraqi Military Forces’ Capacity in the Wake of a Likely U.S. Withdrawal from Iraq 

Read the Dossier Here In the wake of an intense regional escalation that severed Iran and its proxies across the

Materiel for Minerals: How the U.S. Can Leverage Security Assistance to Secure Supply Chains 

Materiel for Minerals: How the U.S. Can Leverage Security Assistance to Secure Supply Chains 

This essay is part of the larger compendium "Future-Proofing U.S. Technology: Strategic Priorities Amid Chinese Tech Advancement." Read the full

Tariffs, AI, and competition with China: experts say America’s opportunity to regain tech supremacy is now

Tariffs, AI, and competition with China: experts say America’s opportunity to regain tech supremacy is now

A new series of reports by New Lines Institute outlines bold steps the U.S. needs to take to secure its