Skip to content

How State-Sanctioned Terrorism by Israeli Settlers Affects the Two-State Solution

Jenin-in-the-occupied-West-Bank
An Israeli army military excavator demolishes a building in Jenin in the occupied West Bank during a large-scale operation on January 24, 2025. (Photo by WAHAJ BANI MOUFLEH/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)

Read the Special Report Here

Israeli settler terrorism, often referred to as “settler violence,” consists of actions targeting Palestinian civilians and property, often involving agricultural destruction, physical assaults, and the incitement of communal violence systematically aimed at intimidating and displacing Palestinians, with the intent to assert Israeli control over the land. Incidents of acts of terrorism committed by Israeli settlers have dramatically increased in the West Bank and East Jerusalem over the last decade, contributing to an already violent environment where peace seems farther away than ever. 

The United States has long been invested in brokering a political solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, favoring a two-state solution that results in increased security for Israel and self-determination and autonomy for a Palestinian state. However, the establishment and expansion of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem have exacerbated the conflict, bringing violent Israeli settlers into closer contact with Palestinian civilians. Instead of countering settler-perpetuated terrorism in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT), the Israeli government has largely turned a blind eye to the violence, in effect sanctioning settler-perpetuated terrorism in favor of advancing Israeli goals for the territory, including potential annexation. Israeli settler terrorism must be taken seriously and effectively countered if the United States wishes to remain committed to prospects of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. 

The following recommendations are offered to policymakers in government to counter Israeli settler terrorism, mitigate violence in the OPT, and restore the necessary environment for achieving a U.S.-brokered two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict:  

  1. The U.S. State Department should designate Israeli settlers and settler organizations that perpetuate violence against Palestinian civilians in the OPT as terrorists and Foreign Terrorist Organizations. 
  2. The U.S. Treasury Department should, to its fullest extent, enforce sanctions against settlers, settlements, and settler organizations that promote and perpetrate terrorism against Palestinian civilians in the OPT. 
  3. The State Department, in collaboration with the FBI, should create an interagency task force to better understand, identify, and combat the networks of Israeli settler terrorism in the OPT.  
  4. The Treasury Department, in coordination with the State Department, should sanction Israeli government officials who support Israeli settler terrorism in the OPT and/or promote rhetoric calling for the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in the OPT.  
  5. The permanent U.S. representative to the U.N. Security Council, in coordination with relevant policymakers, should vote in favor of Security Council resolutions that affirm the illegality of Israeli settlements and condemn Israeli settlement expansion in the OPT. 
  6. The U.S. Congress should condition U.S. aid packages to Israel on certifiable Israeli government action against Israeli settler terrorism in the OPT. 
  7. The Treasury Department should enforce prosecution of U.S. organizations and individuals who finance and provide material support to Israeli settlements in the OPT that are home to Israeli settler terrorists. 

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and not an official policy or position of the New Lines Institute.

Related Articles

Taiwan’s Semiconductor Sustainability and Global Implications 

Taiwan’s Semiconductor Sustainability and Global Implications 

The island’s almost complete reliance on imported energy makes the power-hungry sector vulnerable to disruption. To reduce the risk to Taiwan’s economy, and the worldwide tech supply chain, government policy and industry practices must evolve.

The Rohingya Crisis: Eight Potential Pathways to Repatriation 

The Rohingya Crisis: Eight Potential Pathways to Repatriation 

The only real solution to the Rohingya crisis is a return to their home in Myanmar’s Rakhine state, where they have lived for decades. There are a variety of options available to make that happen.

An Analysis of the Patterns and Limits of Humanitarian Responses to the Rohingyas in Bangladesh 

An Analysis of the Patterns and Limits of Humanitarian Responses to the Rohingyas in Bangladesh 

Outdated conventions and an overburdened U.N. agency explain, in part, why the aid response to the displaced ethnic group has fallen short of meeting even its basic needs.

An Analysis Of Various International Responses To The Conflict In Myanmar Compared With That In Ukraine  

An Analysis Of Various International Responses To The Conflict In Myanmar Compared With That In Ukraine  

In terms of international and military aid, media attention, economic measures, and political response, global reaction to the civil war in Myanmar has been much more muted than that to the Russian invasion of a country in the heart of Eurasia.