Skip to content

Multilateral Asset Transfer: A Proposal for Ensuring Reparations for Ukraine

Multilateral-Asset-Transfer-Legal-Report-cover

Download the Report

Ukrainian Version

The November 2022 U.N. resolution formally recognized that Russia must bear the legal consequences for all its internationally wrongful acts, including making reparations for damages to Ukraine and her people as well as affirming the need for an international mechanism to bring about this compensation.


We face the concrete reality, however, of an unrepentant Russia, determined both to damage Ukraine as severely as possible and to shirk from its international obligations — a Russia that will use its veto power to block any conventional attempts at reparations.


This New Lines Institute proposal builds on past research to illuminate the legal power that nation-states can exercise through their own domestic law to effectuate more than just the freezing of Russian state assets. Instead, nations can legally take a step further and transfer the $350 billion assets to be held in escrow for reconstruction efforts. The international law of state countermeasures entitles states to do so.


By design, our model leads to the creation of a global fund that will serve as a reservoir for these assets — and fast enough to allow reconstruction efforts to begin this year. It secures funds for a devastated Ukraine and preserves Russian incentives to strategically reengage with the international order for the possibility of returning remaining funds to Russian state bank accounts and restoring Russian sovereign immunity.


The Multilateral Asset Transfer Proposal’s power comes from its simplicity; it can be adapted to the specific legal context of each nation adopting it, enabling a unified yet flexible approach to enforcing accountability.


Our proposals and the detailed analysis that follows should serve as a guide and a beacon for nations grappling with the question of reparations. It urges swift action and unity. It is a step toward justice, toward rebuilding Ukraine, and toward a world that unequivocally condemns and deters acts of aggression.


-Dr. Azeem Ibrahim OBE, Director of Special Initiatives

Related Articles

How Western Tech Enables the Kremlin’s Hospital Attack Tactics in Ukraine 

How Western Tech Enables the Kremlin’s Hospital Attack Tactics in Ukraine 

Introduction  Sanctions constraining Russia’s ability to wage war will limit its ability to engage in human rights violations and atrocities,

The United States and the Iran-Israel Conflict

The United States and the Iran-Israel Conflict

In this episode of Eurasian Connectivity, Dr. Kamran Bokhari hosts former CENTCOM commander, Retired Marine Corps Gen. Kenneth F. “Frank” McKenzie, Jr., for a discussion on the intensifying conflict between Iran and Israel, the challenge of Iranian efforts to alter the security architecture of the Middle East, and the implications for U.S. foreign policy in the region and beyond.

An Analysis of the Patterns and Limits of Humanitarian Responses to the Rohingyas in Bangladesh 

An Analysis of the Patterns and Limits of Humanitarian Responses to the Rohingyas in Bangladesh 

Outdated conventions and an overburdened U.N. agency explain, in part, why the aid response to the displaced ethnic group has fallen short of meeting even its basic needs.

An Analysis Of Various International Responses To The Conflict In Myanmar Compared With That In Ukraine  

An Analysis Of Various International Responses To The Conflict In Myanmar Compared With That In Ukraine  

In terms of international and military aid, media attention, economic measures, and political response, global reaction to the civil war in Myanmar has been much more muted than that to the Russian invasion of a country in the heart of Eurasia.