Skip to content

Multilateral Action Model on Reparations

MAMOR Report Cover|Estonian-MAMOR-One-Pager|French-MAMOR-One-Pager|Lithuanian-MAMOR-One-Pager|Ukrainian-MAMOR-One-Pager|Ukrainian-MAMOR-One-Pager-1|Lithuanian-MAMOR-One-Pager-1|French-MAMOR-One-Pager-1|French-MAMOR-One-Pager-2|Estonian-MAMOR-One-Pager-1

Foreword

As Russia’s war against Ukraine continues, policymakers around the world have begun to consider the question of reparations. These will be necessary in compensating Ukraine for Russia’s invasion, and will be vital in the rebuilding of Ukraine’s economy and society.

The Multilateral Action Model on Reparations provides a legal process for the collection and distribution of reparations. It is an answer to that previously unresolved question. The model breaks new ground. It has to, because the war of aggression it is intended to compensate is unlike any other in Europe since 1945.

With Russia a member of the United Nations Security Council, a traditional model of reparations ordered by the U.N. would not pass the Russian U.N. veto. Instead, a new solution has to be devised.

The New Lines Institute convened a team of international legal experts, economists, and scholars to devise a new means of reparations.

Their analysis provides a roadmap for lawfully using Russian funds already frozen by the countries that have sanctioned Russia for its war — and provides a detailed, actionable list of possible sources of Russian state funds for use. It also establishes a functional, efficient means of collecting and distributing those funds, so that they might be used to rebuild Ukraine not in the distant future, but as the war continues.

In 13 Draft Conclusions backed by international law doctrine and practice, this model provides a practical, groundbreaking path to making use of seized and frozen Russian assets to compensate and rebuild Ukraine.

This report is focused on the necessary and immediate work of rebuilding Ukraine. But the model has wider applications. It is our hope that it will be used in future conflicts where traditional models of reparations fail, and that its successful use to assist Ukraine will make it another check on and disincentive for countries that would otherwise be willing to begin a war of aggression.

We believe the New Lines model will be a tool to help keep future peace, as well as one that can aid in Ukraine’s reconstruction.

-Dr. Azeem Ibrahim OBE, Director of Special Initiatives

Full Report Translation:

MAMOR One Page Graphic Translations:

Related Articles

The Return of Children from Camps in Northeast Syria

The Return of Children from Camps in Northeast Syria

European children whose parents joined the Islamic State suffer in squalid camps in Syria with little hope of returning home. Europe needs to take a unified approach to repatriating these minors and ensure support and justice.

The Challenges of Humanitarian Work in Gaza

The Challenges of Humanitarian Work in Gaza

In this episode of Eurasian Connectivity, Kamran Bokhari and Arnaud Quemin, the Middle East regional director of Mercy Corps, talk about the challenges of getting aid into Gaza, its evolving humanitarian situation, and the outlook for stability there after a cease-fire. 

The Aftermath of India’s 2024 Elections

The Aftermath of India’s 2024 Elections

On this episode of Eurasian Connectivity, host Kamran Bokhari and guest Irfan Nooruddin, professor of Indian politics at Georgetown University, break down the recently concluded Indian national elections. Their discussion touches on the political opposition’s gains, the state of Hindutva, and how the results will affect India’s global relationships.

The Accountability, Politics, and Humanitarian Toll of the Rohingya Genocide

The Accountability, Politics, and Humanitarian Toll of the Rohingya Genocide

Since the latest iteration of the genocide of the Rohingya people by the Myanmar military began in August 2017, the Rohingya have faced state-sponsored discrimination, violence, and threats to their ethnic identity.