Skip to content

A Critique of Countering Violent Extremism Programs in Pakistan

CVE Pakistan|Untitled|CVE Pakistan

Executive Summary

■ During the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, coalition forces –particularly the U.S. military – acknowledged that eliminating terrorism through a military response is impossible. Moving from a kinetic military approach, strategists, policymakers, and counterterrorism experts focused on countering violent extremism (CVE) practices and the use of civil society to put those practices in motion.

■ In Pakistan – a frontline state in the war on terrorism – CVE policies and programs are still fundamentally controversial, misunderstood, and heavily criticized by local human rights groups and religious leaders.

■ Pakistani state institutions and civil society organizations have implemented a variety of CVE programs, but there have been no measures of the programs’ effectiveness, and in fact some critics believe the programs are doing more harm than good.

■ Pakistan’s public, media, NGO community and religious communities believe CVE is a politically motivated tool for foreign powers to use to destabilize the country and weaken civil society.

■ Pakistani CVE programs that privilege religious figures and their organizations not only exaggerate their influence, but also harm their legitimacy. People stigmatize these leaders and organizations for receiving foreign funding for CVE initiatives.

■ Pakistan’s national strategy to confront terrorism needs to establish a task force to assess, monitor and evaluate its efficacy in preventing violent extremism. The strategy also needs to incorporate human rights, youth, the education of women, social work, health care, and the religious sector.

■ The Pakistani CVE national strategy would also benefit from increased collaboration with international researchers and from evaluations of different CVE strategies’ effectiveness.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and not an official policy or position of the Newlines Institute.

Related Articles

The Trans-Caspian Corridor and Beyond

The Trans-Caspian Corridor and Beyond

Kamran Bokhari and Eugene Chausovsky dive into recent developments in Eurasia

How the U.S. Can Respond to China’s Engagement in the Middle East 

How the U.S. Can Respond to China’s Engagement in the Middle East 

China’s economic ties with Middle Eastern countries are deepening, and the U.S. needs to pay attention.

Security and Politics in the Caspian and Black Sea Region

Security and Politics in the Caspian and Black Sea Region

Kamran Bokhari and Jennifer Brick Murtazashvili discuss current political and security dynamics in countries such as Afghanistan, Pakistan, Turkey etc.

Offshore Renewable Energy in Asia-Pacific: Defending the Present, Protecting the Future

Offshore Renewable Energy in Asia-Pacific: Defending the Present, Protecting the Future

Southeast Asian countries can contribute to a greener future and increase their economic power by strengthening their offshore energy production.