Skip to content

The Three Percenters: A Look Inside an Anti-Government Militia

2|Anti-Gov Militia|NIReport

The U.S. far-right milieu is not monolithic. It can be divided into at least five sections: racist extremism, namely white nationalism/supremacy; anti-government extremism; nativist extremism; anti-abortion extremism; and male supremacy.

The anti-government movement, which is the most relevant to this brief, can be categorized into six further sub-sections: militias, tax protesters, sovereign citizens, constitutional sheriffs, far-right segments of survivalist or “prepper” communities, and conspiracy propagandists.

The Three Percenter movement is a subset of the larger far-right anti-government militia movement, organized primarily around intense fear and loathing of the U.S. federal government. Although fixated on the federal government, anti-government extremists use coded rhetoric that also expresses anxiety toward historically disenfranchised racial/ethnic/religious minorities. Their ideology and narratives
are malleable enough to identify additional perceived enemies, including Muslims. They also often attempt to portray themselves as armed protectors of the U.S. Constitution against tyrants-in-waiting (the U.S. federal government) and various collaborators (anti-fascists [“antifa”], Black Lives Matter, George Soros, Muslims, and others).

Like other anti-government extremists, Three Percenters frame their activities – including paramilitary, firearms, and other weapons/survival training – in defensive terms. Nevertheless, the movement’s supporters have engaged in armed confrontations with law enforcement and engaged in planned violence against various targets, including American Muslim faith-based institutions.

Related Articles

Iraq’s New Counternarcotics Strategy 

Iraq’s New Counternarcotics Strategy 

The Syrian regime’s involvement in the drug trade could hamper Baghdad’s efforts at regional collaboration.

An Analysis of the Patterns and Limits of Humanitarian Responses to the Rohingyas in Bangladesh 

An Analysis of the Patterns and Limits of Humanitarian Responses to the Rohingyas in Bangladesh 

Outdated conventions and an overburdened U.N. agency explain, in part, why the aid response to the displaced ethnic group has fallen short of meeting even its basic needs.

An Analysis Of Various International Responses To The Conflict In Myanmar Compared With That In Ukraine  

An Analysis Of Various International Responses To The Conflict In Myanmar Compared With That In Ukraine  

In terms of international and military aid, media attention, economic measures, and political response, global reaction to the civil war in Myanmar has been much more muted than that to the Russian invasion of a country in the heart of Eurasia.

Rohingya Cultural Preservation: An Internationally Coordinated Response Is Urgent 

Rohingya Cultural Preservation: An Internationally Coordinated Response Is Urgent 

Their forced diaspora has put the cultural heritage of the embattled ethnic people in danger of erasure. As older generations die out, so is a sense of shared identity.