Skip to content

The Three Percenters: A Look Inside an Anti-Government Militia

2|Anti-Gov Militia|NIReport

The U.S. far-right milieu is not monolithic. It can be divided into at least five sections: racist extremism, namely white nationalism/supremacy; anti-government extremism; nativist extremism; anti-abortion extremism; and male supremacy.

The anti-government movement, which is the most relevant to this brief, can be categorized into six further sub-sections: militias, tax protesters, sovereign citizens, constitutional sheriffs, far-right segments of survivalist or “prepper” communities, and conspiracy propagandists.

The Three Percenter movement is a subset of the larger far-right anti-government militia movement, organized primarily around intense fear and loathing of the U.S. federal government. Although fixated on the federal government, anti-government extremists use coded rhetoric that also expresses anxiety toward historically disenfranchised racial/ethnic/religious minorities. Their ideology and narratives
are malleable enough to identify additional perceived enemies, including Muslims. They also often attempt to portray themselves as armed protectors of the U.S. Constitution against tyrants-in-waiting (the U.S. federal government) and various collaborators (anti-fascists [“antifa”], Black Lives Matter, George Soros, Muslims, and others).

Like other anti-government extremists, Three Percenters frame their activities – including paramilitary, firearms, and other weapons/survival training – in defensive terms. Nevertheless, the movement’s supporters have engaged in armed confrontations with law enforcement and engaged in planned violence against various targets, including American Muslim faith-based institutions.

Related Articles

Conflict-Related Sexual And Reproductive Violence In Tigray

Conflict-Related Sexual And Reproductive Violence In Tigray

Read the full report Here Executive Summary Sexual and reproductive violence inflicted on women, girls, men, boys, and LGBTQI+ persons

Dayton Plus: A Policymaker’s Guide to Constitutional Reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina 

Dayton Plus: A Policymaker’s Guide to Constitutional Reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina 

Read the full report Here To date, the U.S. and the EU have based their policy toward Bosnia and Herzegovina

Why Ukraine Should Reject Russia’s Power of Nyet 

Why Ukraine Should Reject Russia’s Power of Nyet 

A peace deal to end the war between Russia and Ukraine seems closer than ever, but even if one is

Resolving Accountability Over Russian State Assets: New Understandings of Jurisdiction and Policy Opportunities

Resolving Accountability Over Russian State Assets: New Understandings of Jurisdiction and Policy Opportunities

Download the Policy Report Here Almost three years into Russia’s illegal full-scale invasion of Ukraine, approximately $300 billion in frozen